Western Australia’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has rejected a proposal by Polaris Metals, a subsidiary of Mineral Resources, to build a new iron ore mine in the northern Goldfields, after deeming it environmentally unacceptable.

EPA chairman Dr Paul Vogel said the regulator had set the level of assessment on the Jackson 5 and Bungalbin East Iron Ore project as an assessment on proponent information, category B (environmentally unacceptable) in December.

The project is located about 50km north of Koolyanobbing in the Shire of Yilgarn and, according to Vogel it is not fit for implementation as mining the ancient banded iron formation (BIF) landforms of the Helena-Aurora Range in the Mt Manning area would cause irreversible environmental consequences.

"The Helena-Aurora Range has been identified as one of the few remaining intact BIF ranges with the highest biodiversity values in the Yilgarn Craton."

The proposal to build the mine will also disturb about 720ha of land to develop two open cut pits, waste rock dumps and supporting mine infrastructure, and would result in the permanent loss of a significant portion of the Helena-Aurora Range.

Vogel said: "The Helena-Aurora Range has been identified as one of the few remaining intact BIF ranges with the highest biodiversity values in the Yilgarn Craton."

Mining of the BIF landforms is expected to impact significant flora species directly and also result in the loss of critical habitat for these species.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

The regulator decided that the proposal is environmentally unacceptable based on the proponent’s own knowledge and experience, referral information and specialist advice sought.

The proposal is also said to have failed to meet the EPA’s objective for landforms, flora and vegetation.

"If allowed to be implemented, this proposal would remove the physical structure of significant landforms, which host endemic, rare and geographically restricted flora species and vegetation communities."